Archive for October, 2009

Make a Great Day!

Friday, October 30th, 2009

I have often received comments about how I end e-mails, letters, and sign my books with “Make a Great Day!” instead of “Have a Great Day,” so I thought I would share my reasoning.  In Leadership Lessons From the Medicine Wheel I share in Chapter 1 about the concept of Intent, which is closely linked to Volition, and has a lot to do with Personal Responsibility.  Intent or Volition resides in the Center within us.  We have the choice to determine things for ourselves.  As a result, we either choose to do things or we choose to allow others to do things for or to us. 

An example of this is the story I share in Chapter 4 about Personal Power.  In the story my friend the hospital administrator chose to give his Personal Power away by allowing the actions of the doctor to “make him angry.”  In other words, the administrator made the choice to allow the doctor to control the administrator’s emotions.  My friend gave away his Personal Power to the doctor at the same time as he was stealing the Personal Power from the elder.  An interesting paradox, indeed!

So what does this all have to do with the “Make a Great Day!” that I so often share?  Well, when we say “Have a Great Day” or “Have a Nice Day” we are using a more passive tense in our choice of words.  Through this choice of words we acknowledge that the ability to have or not to have a nice or great day is up to environmental controls that we have no real control over.  Sure, we’ll have a nice day if it happens, but if it doesn’t, then there’s just nothing that we can do about it, right? 

Wrong!  We do have the ability to choose how we will act and behave, and we can chose how we will react to other’s behaviors.  One of the basic tenants of the Adventures in Attitudes® program from Inscape Publishing, which was originally created by Bob Conklin over 50 years ago, is “I can’t help the way I think and feel, but I can help the way I act.”  And, of course, our choice in actions provides a double-loop feedback, of sorts, that can impact on how we think and feel. 

So we can make a choice in how we will act as we go throughout the day, and as such we can make that great day for ourselves that I wish everyone.  It simply starts with Intent and making the choice to retain your Personal Power.  No matter what happens during your day, you can choose to make it great.   So stop taking the chance on having a great day just happen and start making great days happen for yourself every day.   

Make a Great Day!

Performance Appraisals — Not!

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Those who have followed my writings on other venues, such as HRNet and TRDEV on Yahoo, will recognize that I am a huge opponent of the use of performance appraisals.  

By performance appraisal I mean the annual (sometimes more frequently) event where a manager sits down and fills out a form which rates individual employees on a variety of predetermined factors.  These factors are most likely rated subjectively, and they may or may not (most likely do not) directly impact upon the overall performance of the organization.  They are also usually focused more around the activities or actions that an employee “should” take, rather than on the outcomes of activities or actions. 

When it comes to performance appraisals, I think that Jim Collins said it best in his accompanying monograph to Good to Great about social sectors.  He stated on the first page: 

“When you compare great companies to good ones, many widely practiced business norms turn out to correlate with mediocrity, not greatness.”

I think this sums up performance appraisals quite nicely.  Many companies engage in them, however, they never drive performance.  I’ve spent the past 4 years reviewing large-scale research studies, case studies, and personal anecdotes on what drives high performance in organizations, and not once was performance appraisals a factor.

The problem with performance appraisals is that they are focused on the past, not future goals and results; they are most often dealing with the subjective opinion of the supervisor, not the objective measures of actual performance; and it happens so infrequently and so far removed from actual performance that any opportunity to enhance performance has long since passed.

I recently shared on the HRNet that I came across an article that was referred by Bob Sutton’s site (co-author of “Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense” with Jeffery Pfeffer that I believe you’ve mentioned before) on this issue.  Sutton was musing about the possibility of performance appraisals doing more harm than good and referenced this article by Dr. Culbert of UCLA Anderson School of Management in the Wall Street Journal.  I found the article very well laid out with some practical approaches at the end. 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122426318874844933.html

There seems to be a growing concern with this issue of the traditional performance appraisals by thought leaders of HR.  I also notice a similar thought process about the replacement.  Terms such as “feedforward” instead of “feedback” or “performance previews” instead of “performance reviews” are becoming more common.  I have previously shared an article by Gallup in other venues on this concept (The Four Disciplines of Sustainable Growth).  Discipline #3 (http://gmj.gallup.com/content/442/Four-Disciplines-Sustainable-Growth.aspx#4) seems to have a lot in common with what Sutton shares at the end of his article.

Also, you might want to read an article by Marshall Goldsmith regarding the concept of “feedforward” as opposed to feedback.  You can find the article here:

http://www.marshallgoldsmith.com/articles/article.asp?a_id=3

I’ll share some more on a nasty variant of performance appraisals, the 360 Degree Assessment later.

Make a Great Day!

Managing for Sustainability

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

In a recent article for Management World Magazine, I shared my thoughts about sustainability for organizations.  Towards the end of the article I indicated that organizations “…must stop managing organizations from quarter to quarter or year to year. Instead, we must manage them for the long-term and beyond the time when we will be with the organization.”

 I received a comment from a reader who shared that they thought that I was being a bit radical in my call for ceasing management on the short-term.  He shared: “Businesses still need their quarterly and yearly plans, budgets and audits. We cannot completely do away with those as they help us shuffle our priorities. Long term planning is an add-on to the normal business activities.”

 My reply was lengthy, which I will share below.  Interesting enough, there seems to be some movement in the direction that I’m advocating.  I just today read an article in CFO Magazine about Credit Suisse taking a different approach to management compensation.  While there are some pitfalls that will need to be avoided by taking the approach that they are taking, I think it will be interesting to see what happens with this organization, and others if they follow suit, over the coming years.

 http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14449706

 My original article on Management World Magazine on Sustainability

 http://cob.jmu.edu/icpm/management_world/trndoct09.pdf

My response to the reader:

I chose those words because I do believe that we need to move away from the quarterly reporting mindset.  This sort of mindset creates a lot of problems for organizations, including the fudging of numbers, making decisions that will impact the numbers for the quarter only briefly, and then cause greater problems in the long run, and other such shortsighted actions that only lead to hurting the organization.  Besides, quarterly reports are only there for the stock analysists, anyway. 

As I share in my book, after analyzing a lot of data about the best organizations I discovered that they are doing different things.  They aren’t running themselves on a quarter-to-quarter basis.  Instead they are collecting real-time information and looking at it daily, but comparing it to their long-term goals and these goals comprise their balanced scorecard.  While some are economic, others are relationship focused or focused on the organization’s ability to take action, while others are focused on achieving longevity for the organization. (see July’s Management World for more information on the four areas for setting REAL Goals: http://cob.jmu.edu/icpm/management_world/bpjuly09.pdf.)

As for shuffling priorities, if you have properly selected your REAL Goals, you can easily prioritize them so that there are no goal conflicts, which many organizations often run into because their goals are ever changing.  With the REAL Goals prioritized you can easily adjust your priorities on a daily basis without having to wait for the end of a quarter or the end of the year.  This makes an organization much more nimble in an ever changing world.

So, yes, I do believe that we must stop managing our organizations for the short term, and give up that practice entirely.  Its fine if a company wishes to continue to share information with stock analysists on a quarterly basis, but that should be a Public Relations function and not a management one.  Long-term, and by that I do mean 20 years or more, should not be the add-on, but rather that should be the Primary focus; everything else that is done is done with these objectives in mind.  Our day-to-day activities are done in order to get us there.

I know that some of what I share is challenging, but believe me, as I conducted my research I had to rethink a lot of what I had been taught, as well.  Keep in mind that “the best organizations don’t just do things differently; they do different things.”

Make a Great Day!

Q&A Session

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

If you have a question about using the Seven Elements of High PerformanceTM, then please ask it here.

Make a Great Day!

Welcome!

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Welcome to the Seven Elements in Action!  In this area we hope to bring you a variety of information and learning experiences about the Seven Elements of High PerformanceTM.  In this area you will get to read some of my thoughts about applying the Seven Elements in your organization.  I will also share some of my real-life experiences with those organizations that are doing a good job of living the Seven Elements, as well as some of those organizations that are challenged by the Seven Elements.  I also welcome and encourage you to share your experiences in implementing the Seven Elements in your organization, as well as asking any questions you might have about how to go about implementing the Seven Elements of High PerformanceTM. 

This is an experiment for me, so I also ask that you be patient with us as we get this new feature off the ground.  Thank you for visiting.

Make a Great Day!